However, much has happened since it went up, including the Blogger outage. Scroll down for a report on that. More new posts will be added below this one. The essay below is the conclusion of the ninth part in a series by Takuan Seiyo.
This fact sheet is based upon developments in the Netherlands through Right-to-die advocates often point to Holland as the model for how well physician-assisted, voluntary euthanasia for terminally-ill, competent patients can work without abuse.
But the facts indicate otherwise. However, as the result of various court cases, doctors who directly kill patients or help patients kill themselves will not be prosecuted as long as they follow certain guidelines. The patient must be experiencing unbearable pain.
The patient must be conscious. The death request must be voluntary. The patient must have been given alternatives to euthanasia and time to consider these alternatives.
There must be no other reasonable solutions to the problem. There must be more than one person involved in the euthanasia decision.
Only a doctor can euthanize a patient. Great care must be taken in actually making the death decision. The question of whether a patient should live or die is often decided exclusively by a doctor or a team of physicians.
It concerns an action of which death is the purpose and the result. One such example was discussed during the December Institute for Bioethics conference in Maastricht, Holland.
The two volume report 6 —popularly referred to as the Remmelink Report after Professor J.
The data indicate that, despite long-standing, court-approved euthanasia guidelines developed to protect patients, abuse has become an accepted norm. According to the Remmelink Report, in That is only half the population of California.
To get some idea of how the Remmelink Report statistics would apply to the U. If the family doctor does not report a case of voluntary euthanasia or an assisted suicide, there is nothing to control.
The study found that, in spite of the fact that medical care is provided to everyone in Holland, palliative care comfort care programs, with adequate pain control techniques and knowledge, were poorly developed.
As of mid, only two hospice programs were in operation in all of Holland, and the services they provided were very limited. Versluys also indicated that euthanasia is an integral part of good medical practice in relation to newborn babies.
Liesbeth Rensman, a spokesperson for the Ministry, said that this would be the first step toward the official sanctioning of euthanasia for those who cannot ask for it, particularly psychiatric patients and handicapped newborns. The court found that psychiatrist Dr.
Boudewijn Chabot was medically justified and followed established euthanasia guidelines in helping his physically healthy, but depressed, patient commit suicide.
The patient, year-old Hilly Bosscher, said she wanted to die after the deaths of her two children and the subsequent breakup of her marriage. According to the Elderly Society director, Hans Homans. Dutch physicians openly defied an order to treat only those patients who had a good chance of full recovery.
They recognized that to comply with the order would have been the first step away from their duty to care for all patients. The German officer who gave that order was later executed for war crimes.
Remarkably, during the entire German occupation of Holland, Dutch doctors never recommended nor participated in one euthanasia death. In actual practice, euthanasia only gives doctors greater power and a license to kill.
A patient can no longer be sure what role the doctor will play—healer or killer. Unlike Holland, where medical care is automatically provided for everyone, in the U.
If euthanasia and assisted-suicide were to become accepted in the U. Even with health care reform in the U. Large numbers of Americans would belong to health maintenance organizations HMOs and managed care programs, and they often would not even know the physicians who end up treating them.
Free Press,p.Male hustlers / sex workers and related issues in many countries, including adolescent boys having sex with men. One of 21 subjects. See Index.
Should Euthanasia or Physician Assisted Suicide Be Legal Essay. Should Euthanasia or Physician Assisted Suicide be Legal? One day while interning at the Animal Clinic of Bay Ridge I witnessed something so cruel.
This middle-aged shiatsu was dropped off at the animal clinic. Mind you, the owners didn’t even bother to come in the room with the dog. Should physician assisted suicide be made legal?
Identify the problem At the time of this writing three states have made physician assisted suicide legal, California, Montana and Washington (Lachman, ).
terminal illness should get the option of assisted suicide. Millions of innocent people suffer every day from physical pain such as heart failure, chronic lung problems, kidney disease, AIDS, cancer and other serious fatal problems [Hospice Report Card]. JTVCC Independent Review Team FINAL Report 1 - Free ebook download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read book online for free.
The word euthanasia translates from Greek roots as "good death." The Oxford English Dictionary states that the original meaning, "a gentle and easy death," has evolved to mean "the actions of inducing a gentle and easy death." This definition is consistent with contemporary use of the term.
For example, the Canadian Senate Special Committee on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide defined euthanasia.